Our Team
Company's employees are highly-trained, experienced and dedicated to the success of our business.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact LegalShield Member Services:
MemberServices@legalshield.com
1-800-654-7757
Monday-Friday 7am-7pm, CT
Thank You,
Linda Brown
VP, LegalShield Member Service
Serves at Community Supper
Willinger, Willinger & Bucci, P.C., particiated in the Golden Hill United Methodist Church Community Supper Program on Wednesday, June 15,
2016. The Community Supper program provides dinner every Wednesday at their downtown Bridgeport location. Serving as Team Linda, attorneys and staff participate in local charities in
memory of Attorney Linda Christiani, a former attorney at the firm. Thanks to paralegal Sonya Green, a member of the Church, for giving us this opportunity to be of service to the
community!
Free Case Consultations
Latest News and Articles
Firm Serves at Community Supper
Nurse Collects $500,000 after Employer Violates Employee Leave Act
Attorney Charles J. Willinger, Jr. selected to 2016 Connecticut Super Lawyers List
Site Map | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2013 Willinger, Willinger & Bucci, P.C. All rights reserved
Attorney Charles J. Willinger,Jr.
Specialties
Land Use And Zoning Law
Professional Development
Year 203-366-3939
Event1
Year to Year
Event
Attorney Toni Marie Gelineau
Specialties
Real Estate Tranasactions
Professional Development
Year to Year 203-366-3939
Event
Attorney James A. Lenes
Specialties
Personal Injury Law
Bankruptcy Law
Commercial Litigation Law
Professional Development
Year to Year 203-366-3939
Event
Attorney Diane M. Lord
Specialties
Land Use Zoning Law
Professional Development
Year to Year 203-366-3939
Evemt
Attorney Mark H. Middlen
Specialties
Personal Injury Law
Divorce and Family Law
Professional Development
Year to Year 203-366-3939
Event
Attorney Athan S. Mihalakos
Specialties
Specialed Education/Shool Law
Transportation Law
Professional Development
Year to Year 203-366-3939
Event
Attorney Matthew D. Newman
Specialties
Personal Injury Law
Divorce and Family Law
Commercial Litigation Law
Professional Development
Year to Year 203-366-3939
Event
Attorney Tracy L. Norris
Specialties
Employment Criminal and Civil Litigation
Professional Development
Year to Year 203-366-3939
Event
Attorney Bradd S. Robbins
Specialties
Real Estate Transactions
Professional Development
Year to Year 203-366-3939
Event
Associate Director Delano Paul
Specialties
Independent Assocate Directors
Legal Plans
Professional Development
Year to Year 516-967-9814
Event
Consultant/Web Developer William Johnson
Specialties
Consultant/Web Developer
Lucky Legal Service
Year to Year 860-560-2704
Professional Development
Event
California data breach law AB1710 stirs up debate on notification requirements
FacebookTweetGoogle PlusLinkedInE-mail
December 10, 2014December 11, 2014 | Kroll Editorial Team
California Assembly Bill No.1710 (AB 1710) was signed into law on September 30, 2014, and amends California’s existing data protection laws, in part by setting forth requirements on what to do if protected data is exposed.
AB1710 takes effect this January 1st, 2015, and there has already been much speculation and debate regarding several key pieces of the legislation. One such point of debate is the wording that amends what must be done if data is breached, which now states that a breached entity must “offer to provide appropriate identity theft prevention and mitigation services, if any, to the affected person at no cost for not less than 12 months if the breach exposed or may have exposed specified personal information.”
It is the use of “if any” as a modifier that is causing contention; i.e., does this phrasing mandate services, or simply that entities choosing to offer services must do so for 12 months? It’s likely this will be answered through guidance issued by the California attorney general’s office; however, the question remains as to what constitutes “appropriate” identity theft prevention and mitigation services?
[California Data BReach Law AB1710] The de facto offering is, of course, credit monitoring. Yet, there are many types of identity theft that cannot be detected by simply viewing the information reported to the credit bureaus. Kroll advocates a risk-based approach, one that relies upon a careful analysis of the facts and circumstances of the event, the types of sensitive information that were breached, the size of the event, and the sensitivity of the impacted population. This type of analysis helps clarify the type of mitigation services that would be appropriate and useful to breach constituents, and also sheds light on the impact of the breach to the organization itself.
Such a measured approach offers an advantage to organizations that have been breached, especially in light of these new requirements in California. There are even indicators that, as in the past, California may be leading the way: Rhode Island and Minnesota for example, have already considered their own bills requiring credit monitoring or other services. It behooves all entities that do business in California to consider the implications of the law, and to begin considering the types of meaningful mitigation services they can offer consumers.
Tags: Cyber Security Identity Theft Law/Legal Other Technology, Media & Telecoms United States
About the Author
Kroll Editorial Team
About the Author
Kroll Editorial Team
Cyber Security
Resources
Find out more about Kroll's cyber security capabilities
Read about Kroll's data breach and incident response capabilities
Learn about Kroll's computer forensics capabilities
Subscribe to the Kroll Cyber Security Newsletter
Stay Connected
- Subscribe to receive updates now
Thank you for your interest in the latest updates on trends and developments in risk prevention, response and remediation. If you are not currently subscribed, you can use the form below to register for Kroll's Perspectives Newsletter. If you do not see a form, you are already successfully registered.
Trending Topics
Ghosts of retail data breaches: Past, present and future
by Jennifer Rothstein | December 11, 2014
Breach Prevention Cyber Security Identity Theft Response Notification Insurance Retail, Wholesale & Distribution EMEA United States
California data breach law AB1710 stirs up debate on notification requirements
by Kroll Editorial Team | December 10, 2014
Cyber Security Identity Theft Law/Legal Other Technology, Media & Telecoms United States
Anyone want to buy a data breach?
by Alex Gross | November 4, 2014
Breach Prevention Cyber Investigations Cyber Security Data Breach Response and Remediation Data Security Business Services Insurance Law/Legal Retail, Wholesale & Distribution EMEA United
States
Ghosts of retail data breaches: Past, present and future
by Jennifer Rothstein | December 11, 2014
Breach Prevention Cyber Security Identity Theft Response Notification Insurance Retail, Wholesale & Distribution EMEA United States
California data breach law AB1710 stirs up debate on notification requirements
by Kroll Editorial Team | December 10, 2014
Cyber Security Identity Theft Law/Legal Other Technology, Media & Telecoms United States
Anyone want to buy a data breach?
by Alex Gross | November 4, 2014
Breach Prevention Cyber Investigations Cyber Security Data Breach Response and Remediation Data Security Business Services Insurance Law/Legal Retail, Wholesale & Distribution EMEA United
States
Topics
Compliance
Cyber Security
Due Diligence
Investigations
Industries
Consumer Goods
Financial Services
Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology
Law/Legal
Natural Resources
Retail
Regions
Americas
Africa
Asia Pacific
Europe
The Gulf States
About
About the Blog
Authors
Resources
Contact Us
Subscribe
[Kroll's Official Blog]
[Kroll's Official Blog]
Contact
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Kroll.com
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Cookies Policy
Copyright © 2015 Kroll. All rights reserved.
at XEROTICA.COM